The Trump Administration has floated plans to cut back on SNAP, that is, on food stamp, benefits.
Did
we really expect anything else? Almost every Trump policy has been
insensitive. In response, I'm reproducing below most of a post I
did on this topic about three years ago, for the blog of the United Steel Workers.
The instinct of some to condemn SNAP participants as freeloaders or
criminals is troubling. I’m neither. I have a Master’s degree in
Computer Information Science. I taught for over 20 years at various
institutions of higher education. The lack of a doctorate cost me jobs,
though, and now causes me to have to rely on food stamps to supplement
my income.
Despite millions of SNAP participants having stories like mine, we’re
seeing a trend. When the poor or middle class object to preferential
treatment for the rich, it's called class warfare. But when the very-well-to-do refer to food stamp recipients as welfare queens, it’s okay.
Caricatures of food stamp phonies
created by conservative media are bogus. Here’s the reality. On
average, an individual receives about $133 per month in food stamps.
That works out to about $4 per day. As the Baltimore Sun put it, Blow it on a frappuccino, and that's one less day's food.
Any government action that discourages fraud [or waste] is, of course,
worthwhile. But there's no evidence SNAP is out of control. It helps
feed more than 40 million Americans at an annual cost of $64 billion, or
about $1,600 per person per year. That’s hardly exorbitant.
No comments:
Post a Comment