A bit more than five years ago, I was still blogging for the USW. One of those pieces remains relevant today, particularly in light of the fact that the current partial shutdown of the Federal government has affected and may continue to affect those who receive SNAP, AKA food stamp, benefits.
When the piece was written, I relied on SNAP for about half my monthly grocery budget. I still do. Read what's below in light of that.
Let me start with a brief bio. I’m newly retired. Social Security
leaves me a couple hundred dollars short each month, so I plan to apply
for the SNAP program – that is, for food stamps.
The instinct of some to condemn SNAP participants as freeloaders or
criminals is troubling. I’m neither. I have a Master’s degree in
Computer Information Science. I taught for over 20 years at various
institutions of higher education. The lack of a doctorate cost me jobs,
though, and now causes me to have to rely on food stamps to supplement
my income.
Despite millions of SNAP participants having stories like mine, we’re
seeing a trend. When the poor or middle class object to preferential
treatment for the rich, it's called class warfare. But when the very-well-to-do refer to food stamp recipients as welfare queens, it’s okay.
Here’s the reality. On
average, an individual receives about $133 per month in food stamps.
That works out to about $4 per day.
Any government action that discourages fraud is, of course,
worthwhile. But there's no evidence SNAP is out of control. It helps
feed more than 40 million Americans at an annual cost of $64 billion, or
about $1,600 per person per year. That’s hardly exorbitant. Rather,
it emphasizes the hardships created by the worst recession in several
decades.
And, one might add today, the hardships induced by the Trump Shutdown.
No comments:
Post a Comment