From 2008 to 2018, the National Rifle Association decimated the number of A ratings it gave to Congressional Democrats, and more than doubled As handed out to Republicans .
Let's shed more light on those grades. The NRA uses A ratings to indicate support for gun rights
and opposition to restrictions; F ratings, on the other hand, mean just the opposite; an F is a vote of censure.. After assigning grades, the NRA then publicizes those scores to its members, who in turn use them to guide their
votes. In addition, A-rated candidates often receive endorsements, and the campaign support that can result. In 2008, 67 A-rated Democrats - about 25% of the Democratic caucus in the House - had been elected. That same year, there were also 13
Democrats with B ratings, meaning the N.R.A. considered
them generally pro-gun.
But what a difference a decade makes. In 2008, in a House and Senate controlled by Democrats, that party got a 52.1% A rating, and a 33.8% F rating from the NRA. In 2018, we're faced with a mirror image. Republicans got a 52.5% A rating, and a 43.5% F rating. Add to all this the fact that in 2018, total contributions from the NRA to federal candidates
were almost entirely to Republicans. Specifically, the GOP got 97% of the NRA's $699,750.00, and Democrats got only 3%.
Here's a play-by-play.
No comments:
Post a Comment